About this trail:
You're welcome NinjaNurse.
I've enjoyed looking through the older threads, since really nothing goes out of style, and I guess I had to get my two cents off my chest too.
Sounds like you have no distractions in the ring. I'd have trepidations for two reasons, neither of them are my ego. After all you paid hard-earned money to get beat on by another student (it's in the fine print).
Ego is an excuse, but perhaps a valid one for some and for insecure people trying to do better, it may be a situation they'll have to work themselves into. Nothing wrong with trying to get over insecurities, as long as it's not 'chest-thumping' insecurities.
Anyway, for me first it's my height. I've learned to be gentle cause I grew tall, big and strong fast, but I was awkward and clumsy like it was written on my forehead. And I could knock over someone walking without knowing it. I was the standard example for show and tell by the gym teacher: 'Ok here's how you defend against the really tall guy. Tall guy come up here so I can show the class how it's done. Whack whack whack! Ok thank you tall guy.' Ugh.
I could pick up the biggest rock (boy stuff), yet I'd reach to put my arm around my date and end up clocking her upside the head with my elbow. So I kept it toned down cause of my size, strength and leverage.
So for me unless you're my height, it's ingrained and it'd be a little hard for me to go from standard operating 70% and really careful to cutting loose closer to 100% and actually wanting to make contact with you over and over. My brain would be screaming to stop! Hence the training, right?
Yep!
And second there's a general mindset I think men have about violence rooted in culture and history. Men are the ones who start wars, men are the criminals, men shoot each other over anything, men rape, men are the bloodthirsty conquers in history, the dictators are men, the war criminals are men, Genghis Kahn, Pol Pok, Hitler, Saddam, Napoleon, men are by and large the violent ones ready to spill blood if need be and that's who we're expecting to face when we step up. And I think this 'memory' comes to bear like an unexpected hic-cup when faced against a woman so ready for blood (so to speak) and a look in her eye that tell us 'ready or not'. For me at least it's not in the forefront of my mind, but when some of us become aware of it, it makes us say 'whoa. This is unexpected.' Like you truly are from Venus at that moment.
For example remember when we all first heard about female suicide bombers. I know a lot of men were saying, 'What'? It took a moment to expect that of a woman. And like this female Sunday school teacher who raped and killed that 8 year-old-girl? I know most everyone men and women in the nation said, 'What? A woman?' And I know everyone tried to think back to the last time anything like that happened. If it were a man, it'd be sadly expected for the crime. None of us here would say, 'What? A man did that?'
So while my distractions wouldn't be ego they would be a distractions nonetheless, and if I were up against you Ninja, disastrous for me too.
Facing a woman like the original poster did gives most men pause the first few times I'm sure, maybe every time, for a number of reasons. I relate to his trepidation.
i very much appreciate your post, NinjaNurse! Your quote is invaluable! Thank you.
| Quote: |
| I choose to enter the ring knowing full well the risks and benefits |
Sounds like you have no distractions in the ring. I'd have trepidations for two reasons, neither of them are my ego. After all you paid hard-earned money to get beat on by another student (it's in the fine print).
Ego is an excuse, but perhaps a valid one for some and for insecure people trying to do better, it may be a situation they'll have to work themselves into. Nothing wrong with trying to get over insecurities, as long as it's not 'chest-thumping' insecurities.
Anyway, for me first it's my height. I've learned to be gentle cause I grew tall, big and strong fast, but I was awkward and clumsy like it was written on my forehead. And I could knock over someone walking without knowing it. I was the standard example for show and tell by the gym teacher: 'Ok here's how you defend against the really tall guy. Tall guy come up here so I can show the class how it's done. Whack whack whack! Ok thank you tall guy.' Ugh.
So for me unless you're my height, it's ingrained and it'd be a little hard for me to go from standard operating 70% and really careful to cutting loose closer to 100% and actually wanting to make contact with you over and over. My brain would be screaming to stop! Hence the training, right?
And second there's a general mindset I think men have about violence rooted in culture and history. Men are the ones who start wars, men are the criminals, men shoot each other over anything, men rape, men are the bloodthirsty conquers in history, the dictators are men, the war criminals are men, Genghis Kahn, Pol Pok, Hitler, Saddam, Napoleon, men are by and large the violent ones ready to spill blood if need be and that's who we're expecting to face when we step up. And I think this 'memory' comes to bear like an unexpected hic-cup when faced against a woman so ready for blood (so to speak) and a look in her eye that tell us 'ready or not'. For me at least it's not in the forefront of my mind, but when some of us become aware of it, it makes us say 'whoa. This is unexpected.' Like you truly are from Venus at that moment.
For example remember when we all first heard about female suicide bombers. I know a lot of men were saying, 'What'? It took a moment to expect that of a woman. And like this female Sunday school teacher who raped and killed that 8 year-old-girl? I know most everyone men and women in the nation said, 'What? A woman?' And I know everyone tried to think back to the last time anything like that happened. If it were a man, it'd be sadly expected for the crime. None of us here would say, 'What? A man did that?'
So while my distractions wouldn't be ego they would be a distractions nonetheless, and if I were up against you Ninja, disastrous for me too.
Facing a woman like the original poster did gives most men pause the first few times I'm sure, maybe every time, for a number of reasons. I relate to his trepidation.
i very much appreciate your post, NinjaNurse! Your quote is invaluable! Thank you.
Trail link: http://trailfire.com/akedm/trails/84610
Summary: http://trailfire.com/akedm/trailview/84610
Summary: http://trailfire.com/akedm/trailview/84610
1
You're welcome NinjaNurse.
I've enjoyed looking through the older threads, since really nothing goes out of style, and I guess I had to get my two cents off my chest too.
Sounds like you have no distractions in the ring. I'd have trepidations for two reasons, neither of them are my ego. After all you paid hard-earned money to get beat on by another student (it's in the fine print).
Ego is an excuse, but perhaps a valid one for some and for insecure people trying to do better, it may be a situation they'll have to work themselves into. Nothing wrong with trying to get over insecurities, as long as it's not 'chest-thumping' insecurities.
Anyway, for me first it's my height. I've learned to be gentle cause I grew tall, big and strong fast, but I was awkward and clumsy like it was written on my forehead. And I could knock over someone walking without knowing it. I was the standard example for show and tell by the gym teacher: 'Ok here's how you defend against the really tall guy. Tall guy come up here so I can show the class how it's done. Whack whack whack! Ok thank you tall guy.' Ugh.
I could pick up the biggest rock (boy stuff), yet I'd reach to put my arm around my date and end up clocking her upside the head with my elbow. So I kept it toned down cause of my size, strength and leverage.
So for me unless you're my height, it's ingrained and it'd be a little hard for me to go from standard operating 70% and really careful to cutting loose closer to 100% and actually wanting to make contact with you over and over. My brain would be screaming to stop! Hence the training, right?
Yep!
And second there's a general mindset I think men have about violence rooted in culture and history. Men are the ones who start wars, men are the criminals, men shoot each other over anything, men rape, men are the bloodthirsty conquers in history, the dictators are men, the war criminals are men, Genghis Kahn, Pol Pok, Hitler, Saddam, Napoleon, men are by and large the violent ones ready to spill blood if need be and that's who we're expecting to face when we step up. And I think this 'memory' comes to bear like an unexpected hic-cup when faced against a woman so ready for blood (so to speak) and a look in her eye that tell us 'ready or not'. For me at least it's not in the forefront of my mind, but when some of us become aware of it, it makes us say 'whoa. This is unexpected.' Like you truly are from Venus at that moment.
For example remember when we all first heard about female suicide bombers. I know a lot of men were saying, 'What'? It took a moment to expect that of a woman. And like this female Sunday school teacher who raped and killed that 8 year-old-girl? I know most everyone men and women in the nation said, 'What? A woman?' And I know everyone tried to think back to the last time anything like that happened. If it were a man, it'd be sadly expected for the crime. None of us here would say, 'What? A man did that?'
So while my distractions wouldn't be ego they would be a distractions nonetheless, and if I were up against you Ninja, disastrous for me too.
Facing a woman like the original poster did gives most men pause the first few times I'm sure, maybe every time, for a number of reasons. I relate to his trepidation.
i very much appreciate your post, NinjaNurse! Your quote is invaluable! Thank you.
| Quote: |
| I choose to enter the ring knowing full well the risks and benefits |
Sounds like you have no distractions in the ring. I'd have trepidations for two reasons, neither of them are my ego. After all you paid hard-earned money to get beat on by another student (it's in the fine print).
Ego is an excuse, but perhaps a valid one for some and for insecure people trying to do better, it may be a situation they'll have to work themselves into. Nothing wrong with trying to get over insecurities, as long as it's not 'chest-thumping' insecurities.
Anyway, for me first it's my height. I've learned to be gentle cause I grew tall, big and strong fast, but I was awkward and clumsy like it was written on my forehead. And I could knock over someone walking without knowing it. I was the standard example for show and tell by the gym teacher: 'Ok here's how you defend against the really tall guy. Tall guy come up here so I can show the class how it's done. Whack whack whack! Ok thank you tall guy.' Ugh.
So for me unless you're my height, it's ingrained and it'd be a little hard for me to go from standard operating 70% and really careful to cutting loose closer to 100% and actually wanting to make contact with you over and over. My brain would be screaming to stop! Hence the training, right?
And second there's a general mindset I think men have about violence rooted in culture and history. Men are the ones who start wars, men are the criminals, men shoot each other over anything, men rape, men are the bloodthirsty conquers in history, the dictators are men, the war criminals are men, Genghis Kahn, Pol Pok, Hitler, Saddam, Napoleon, men are by and large the violent ones ready to spill blood if need be and that's who we're expecting to face when we step up. And I think this 'memory' comes to bear like an unexpected hic-cup when faced against a woman so ready for blood (so to speak) and a look in her eye that tell us 'ready or not'. For me at least it's not in the forefront of my mind, but when some of us become aware of it, it makes us say 'whoa. This is unexpected.' Like you truly are from Venus at that moment.
For example remember when we all first heard about female suicide bombers. I know a lot of men were saying, 'What'? It took a moment to expect that of a woman. And like this female Sunday school teacher who raped and killed that 8 year-old-girl? I know most everyone men and women in the nation said, 'What? A woman?' And I know everyone tried to think back to the last time anything like that happened. If it were a man, it'd be sadly expected for the crime. None of us here would say, 'What? A man did that?'
So while my distractions wouldn't be ego they would be a distractions nonetheless, and if I were up against you Ninja, disastrous for me too.
Facing a woman like the original poster did gives most men pause the first few times I'm sure, maybe every time, for a number of reasons. I relate to his trepidation.
i very much appreciate your post, NinjaNurse! Your quote is invaluable! Thank you.
2
| I dont have any either, but I'll chew on it like I do (maybe something will come to me over breakfast tomorrow) - but I know quite often the littlest ones are enrolled for two reasons : 1) a parent is also attending, and so it's a way for them to do an activity with their child while keeping an eye on them, and/or 2) the parents just want to wear the kids out and this is better than just tearing up the house or the McDonald's Playland. There is no 3 in my opinion because although they're in a ma discipline, the parents are not (I think) hoping you'll be able to teach them discipline in general. I think 2 is the most common reason. So I'm thinking of something that keeps the little ones busy and engaged....maybe a secondary instructor to you for the children....maybe someone who will pull them into a smaller group not facing the rest of the class and who can focus just on the kiddies...sort of like a parallel class but kid oriented (same time, same room, same kicks or whatever you're doing that day, etc...) someone who's not squeamish to get down onto their level (height-wise speaking) and get them engaged with enthusiasm, who uses their arms and is expressive like a Crocodile-Hunter type of guy you know he was always talking with his hands and his voice you couldnt help but listen to the guy....anyway someone who holds their attention....that's all I got now. Good luck. _________________ Karate vs. Judo --> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8jyGbgjTAA&feature=related |
3
Now I can understand why practicing the kick to the groin would be useful, I think anyone can understand that. But that should be saved for real-life self-defense training, right?
I heard this from my friend that sometimes in class the guys end up getting kicked in the groin and even with a cup they say it hurts. She said it's a great spot to kick - well duh. She didnt say more about it and I didnt ask so maybe it was just accident after unintentional accident (poor kick control), but if not - if it's an intentional thing - then my thinking in sparring is that if you decide to come at me with an attack intended to double me over instead of deciding to spar with me on moves karate has taught, then forget ma altogether cause I'm coming at you with an attack to make you double over. I dont care if you're a 5'4" 120lb girl or a 6'4" 255lb guy like me. You no longer deserve a pass or to keep the belt you earned.
I'll say again for those who dont know me, I'm not a ma practitioner of any kind. And I'll say it, I have trouble confronting my violent side - I'm not violent mainly cause I've had too much of that in my past - so maybe I lack that combative mindset. But I'd consider the groin area off limits in sparring and even kumite, but maybe that's cause I dont understand the "rules of the ring". So to me I'd kinda lose it cause to me it's not a sparring move, it's a personal attack.
Granted a guy needs to learn to defend against it, but still it shouldnt be a "free kick' zone for the opponent in a regulated match. A martial arts discipline is not primarily taken for real-life self defense, a self-defense class is. In ma you're in it for years, so you'd be in the wrong class if your intent is to learn self-defense like groin kicks and whatnot. If you want to learn self-defense you want to learn it now cause you feel you have a need to learn it now, so you take a self-defense class so you can learn what works immediately.
Physically speaking ma is a sport with competitions like kata and kumite (spelling??), or taken as an exercise like going to the gym. Either way it's an undertaking of slow progression and discipline. So why when sparring would groin kicks be allowed? Or are they? Are they in your class or is there a rule against them?
I heard this from my friend that sometimes in class the guys end up getting kicked in the groin and even with a cup they say it hurts. She said it's a great spot to kick - well duh. She didnt say more about it and I didnt ask so maybe it was just accident after unintentional accident (poor kick control), but if not - if it's an intentional thing - then my thinking in sparring is that if you decide to come at me with an attack intended to double me over instead of deciding to spar with me on moves karate has taught, then forget ma altogether cause I'm coming at you with an attack to make you double over. I dont care if you're a 5'4" 120lb girl or a 6'4" 255lb guy like me. You no longer deserve a pass or to keep the belt you earned.
I'll say again for those who dont know me, I'm not a ma practitioner of any kind. And I'll say it, I have trouble confronting my violent side - I'm not violent mainly cause I've had too much of that in my past - so maybe I lack that combative mindset. But I'd consider the groin area off limits in sparring and even kumite, but maybe that's cause I dont understand the "rules of the ring". So to me I'd kinda lose it cause to me it's not a sparring move, it's a personal attack.
Granted a guy needs to learn to defend against it, but still it shouldnt be a "free kick' zone for the opponent in a regulated match. A martial arts discipline is not primarily taken for real-life self defense, a self-defense class is. In ma you're in it for years, so you'd be in the wrong class if your intent is to learn self-defense like groin kicks and whatnot. If you want to learn self-defense you want to learn it now cause you feel you have a need to learn it now, so you take a self-defense class so you can learn what works immediately.
Physically speaking ma is a sport with competitions like kata and kumite (spelling??), or taken as an exercise like going to the gym. Either way it's an undertaking of slow progression and discipline. So why when sparring would groin kicks be allowed? Or are they? Are they in your class or is there a rule against them?
4
Certainly not, nor would I hope they would be.
Let me tell you what I'm seeing right now in my head more than with any other post: We're all sitting around a table, you, me and a bunch of other people who haven’t spoken, men, women, instructors, and most everyone’s in ma; In fact everyone is, except me. So maybe my question is naïve, but nonetheless we talk about it, and I appreciate that. Thank you.
And now the topic's hit a lull. And though all the men know exactly the pain and vulnerability we’ve talked about, none of the women have decided to speak. I think that’s interesting. They’re the ones often attacking that spot.
I imagine if we were in a circle or at a table a few of us would notice none of the women spoke up. I imagine a few of us would like to hear from a few because in fact their mindset may generally be different. At any rate their silence is noticeable.
Let me put it a different way: Why am I asking the question? I thought the topic important enough that I’d try to spread an awareness that the women may not fully appreciate unless it were done to them.
Obviously that's not possible; hence, my curiosity at their silence. Do they appreciate the potential devastation of that attack? Perceptually they might, on the side of their mind they might, but probably not front and center like a man. Police train with pepper spray to the face so the user may know exactly how it feels. Every trainee, male and female, becomes aware of that equally.
So for a kick to the man’s groin I’d use an analogy everyone could appreciate equally. My idea being that there are no men or woman in ma; there are only students.
I’d equate a kick in the groin to a poke in the eye: easily accomplished, without much force, to a vulnerable spot, and devastating to all the senses. Might the other sex be a bit more respectful to what they may consider a casual though devastating attack if they too had the mental picture of getting poked in the eye?
Might then the sparring matches be more productive and safe for everyone? After all it is practice, not personal and all about discipline. I imagine the instructor wants everyone to show up the next day 100% ready to go.
Thank you, Justice, I was not clear enough before in my post. I was clumsy Thanks for asking for clarification.
If we were actually at the table I’d use that analogy so everyone is aware and everyone is on the same page of how devastating that attack is, especially the women. Some, though I guarantee not all women have that particular perspective. And before sparring think everyone should have the same perspective.
Let me tell you what I'm seeing right now in my head more than with any other post: We're all sitting around a table, you, me and a bunch of other people who haven’t spoken, men, women, instructors, and most everyone’s in ma; In fact everyone is, except me. So maybe my question is naïve, but nonetheless we talk about it, and I appreciate that. Thank you.
And now the topic's hit a lull. And though all the men know exactly the pain and vulnerability we’ve talked about, none of the women have decided to speak. I think that’s interesting. They’re the ones often attacking that spot.
I imagine if we were in a circle or at a table a few of us would notice none of the women spoke up. I imagine a few of us would like to hear from a few because in fact their mindset may generally be different. At any rate their silence is noticeable.
Let me put it a different way: Why am I asking the question? I thought the topic important enough that I’d try to spread an awareness that the women may not fully appreciate unless it were done to them.
Obviously that's not possible; hence, my curiosity at their silence. Do they appreciate the potential devastation of that attack? Perceptually they might, on the side of their mind they might, but probably not front and center like a man. Police train with pepper spray to the face so the user may know exactly how it feels. Every trainee, male and female, becomes aware of that equally.
So for a kick to the man’s groin I’d use an analogy everyone could appreciate equally. My idea being that there are no men or woman in ma; there are only students.
I’d equate a kick in the groin to a poke in the eye: easily accomplished, without much force, to a vulnerable spot, and devastating to all the senses. Might the other sex be a bit more respectful to what they may consider a casual though devastating attack if they too had the mental picture of getting poked in the eye?
Might then the sparring matches be more productive and safe for everyone? After all it is practice, not personal and all about discipline. I imagine the instructor wants everyone to show up the next day 100% ready to go.
Thank you, Justice, I was not clear enough before in my post. I was clumsy Thanks for asking for clarification.
If we were actually at the table I’d use that analogy so everyone is aware and everyone is on the same page of how devastating that attack is, especially the women. Some, though I guarantee not all women have that particular perspective. And before sparring think everyone should have the same perspective.






