Source Mode
| Editor Mode








Why is WikiAnnotation important for Online Communities?
Isn't Wiki enough?
Wikis allow inline annotations with normal wiki page editing?
-- FridemarPache
Note: Don't confuse an AnnotationWiki with WikiAnnotation. An AnnotationWiki is a repository for annotations material, to be pasted into rich text/link annotation dialogues, whereas WikiAnnotation makes only wiki pages the targets of annotations. Of course an AnnotationWiki can be itself the target of some WikiAnnotation.
Why is WikiAnnotation important for Online Communities?
Isn't Wiki enough?
Wikis allow inline annotations with normal wiki page editing?
-- FridemarPache
Note: Don't confuse an AnnotationWiki with WikiAnnotation. An AnnotationWiki is a repository for annotations material, to be pasted into rich text/link annotation dialogues, whereas WikiAnnotation makes only wiki pages the targets of annotations. Of course an AnnotationWiki can be itself the target of some WikiAnnotation.
PS.:
{ To test, if collaboration by annotation works at this early state in the history of social annotation, the authorDiiGos andTrailMarks this page. He asks his peers in Wiki,DiiGoandTrailFire:
TrailFireA short [video introduction from the CEO of TrailFire] can be found on YouTube.
What about starting our research on TrailFire with the tools of TrailFire itself. -- HansWobbe, FridemarPache
Actions:
It's rare for me to be able to take a look at something and immediately see that I want to start using it. So far, this seems to be one of those pieces of software. That being said, I have no idea what-so-ever of their business model yet, so I'll be cautious about becoming dependant on it until I know what it may end up costing me. -- HansWobbe
Thank you Hans for starting this page. Therefore I inserted your name in the initial authors list, removing the placeholder notice and inviting interested peers to start a trail on TrailFire.
What name for the trail do you suggest? TrailFire? Is there such a trail already, we can join? If we join an existing trail, can we use all trail functions or only comments? What about the wiki-like joined editing? -- [fridemar]
Hans, I take up the ball, you played. Just as you did it, I used different annotation systems to get a critical mass of participants for our initiative. Besides that I appreciated in the public news blog of TrailFire the growing wikiness of this innovative social annotation system. Find a copy of my comment as a DiiGo annotation below.
I annotated the FAQ of TrailFire with DiiGo annotations and I am going to use additionally WikAlong. On the other hand, it would be a pity, if this topic would be cut off the MeatballWiki, which is a community of existing and potential new communities.
What about an AnnotationWiki, where all annotation streams of the different annotation communities can flow together. In this way mutual benefit can be created:
By natural selection, those wikis with the greatest "cumulated wisdom of the crowds", are candidates for the most appropriate AnnotationWiki.
I am going to set up a trail in TrailFire, called AnnotationWiki. This Trail is set up in wiki-mode, such that everyone is invited and enabled to edit the chain.
Hans, do you allow me to blog this page? In the sense of reciprocity you are given the same permission, of course. I know from your engagement in CommunityWiki, that you are open for such a question. Using the button "Blog This page" is a great timesaver. Otherwise each author had to reassemble their stuff.
For the sake of simplicity: If somebody writes on this page, please make it explicit, if you dont want to be included in the "Blog This" practise.As long as there is no veto on this page and the current authors have given their licets, each author, signing with their real name, is allowed to blog a snapshot of the whole page on their own weblog. Thank you. -- [fridemar]
PS.: You find my Diigo annotation on: http://blog.trailfire.com/news/2007/04/contact_list.html

























































VirtualTwinPageNote:
As an example let's tag this WikiPage with a DiiGo or TrailFire tag (other tagging systems welcome)
tag = "VirtualTwinPage"
Then any wikipage T1 of some wiki W1 in the web, that contributes to this notion, tagged by "VirtualTwinPage", is indeed a VirtualTwinPage to W2="MeatballWiki". It needs not necessarily have exact the same title, but it should contribute to this topic.
Virtual twinning allows easier making of StrongLinks. We only need to leave a bottom line, as practised on this page and on TwinPage -- [fridemar]
This fosters AccidentalLinking.
The main advantage of social annotation systems is their capability to heal the Web from its chronic weakness of not having implemented StrongLinks from the start on. "The current Web suffers from WeakLinks?". "The current Web's weakness is caused by being based on WeakLinks?." "The current Web's weakness is exploited by a multi billion dollar industry".
Discussion:
TwinPageDiscussion:
This term was never clearly defined or applied, as far as the author knows. The metapher "twin" implies symmetry in the sense, that "A is a twin to B" is equivalent to "B is a twin to A". It is a similar misnomer as SisterSite.
Therefore the author originally added the alternative term FriendPage -- FridemarPache
Notes:
A couple of additional points...
Hi Hans,
-- [fridemar]
-- HansWobbe
Hi Hans,
-- [fridemar]
Now we need a decent term for the Wikis who have TwinPages in common. "Sister" A cannot have a T1, wheras "Sister" B has a T2, where T1,T2 are twin pages. Therefore the autor suggests the term TwinWiki. -- FridemarPache
Attention:
-- [fridemar]
Warning: TagCombinations of DiiGo got lost. There was a time, when they worked.
On del.iceo.us, an associated bookmarking community, who got automatically the author's bookmarks by the simultaneous bookmarking feature of DiiGo: there is a [remnant]