<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/pages/css/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss xmlns:ps="http://trailfire.com" version="2.0"><channel><title>"Worst search engins: your choice, your ratings" by webfreak</title><link>http://trailfire.com/webfreak/trails/23918</link><category>webfreak/trails</category><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Top 10 worst search engins</title><link>http://trailfire.com/webfreak/marks/46978</link><description><![CDATA[Rating the best search engins is easier than rating the worst ones. But with the high competition in the world of search engins this has become mandatory. In order to make the most effective search you need guidelines too. This webpage rates the 10 worst search engins for your convenience.]]></description><category>Worst search engins: your choice, your ratings</category><author>webfreak</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:22:13 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:46978</guid></item><item><title>Worst search engins: article bag</title><link>http://trailfire.com/webfreak/marks/46979</link><description><![CDATA[There are many search engins that may have gained some amount of popularity but lack technically. It is very important to know about them before making the right choice. This website is a bag of articles on worst search engins chosen from various sources to help you understand better, the tricks and techniques that the engins apply to fool users.]]></description><category>Worst search engins: your choice, your ratings</category><author>webfreak</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:26:14 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:46979</guid></item><item><title>Worst search engins: how gruesome are they?</title><link>http://trailfire.com/webfreak/marks/46980</link><description><![CDATA[It is apparently easy to rate a search engine as bad or rather useless without knowing much about it. We often fail to value search engines due to our ignorance. On this blog you will find the personal experience of an user who delves deep into the searching process and talks about her own experience with search engins.]]></description><category>Worst search engins: your choice, your ratings</category><author>webfreak</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:29:49 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:46980</guid></item><item><title>Register: worst search engine</title><link>http://trailfire.com/webfreak/marks/46982</link><description><![CDATA[Register had been quite a popular search engine amongst techies and weblovers. There had been complaints about this search engine too. The Register webpage clarifies doubts about thsi search engine. The website also assists IT pros by sending free newsletter for enhanced knowledge.]]></description><category>Worst search engins: your choice, your ratings</category><author>webfreak</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:33:18 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:46982</guid></item><item><title>Google: one of worst search engins- hard to believe</title><link>http://trailfire.com/webfreak/marks/46983</link><description><![CDATA[Common web-surfers will discard the idea of google&#39;s being one of the worst search engins, outright. This article challenges the thought and states &quot;if you don’t believe Google is the worst, try a few comparative searches of your own.&quot; There are many other strong arguments that the article puts forward to validate the point that google is one of the worst search engins. Read it to believe it or not.]]></description><category>Worst search engins: your choice, your ratings</category><author>webfreak</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:37:35 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:46983</guid></item></channel></rss>
