<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/pages/css/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss xmlns:ps="http://trailfire.com" version="2.0"><channel><title>"USB vs Firewire: the web-game is on" by Neruba</title><link>http://trailfire.com/Neruba/trails/27897</link><category>Neruba/trails</category><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>USB vs Firewire: which is better</title><link>http://trailfire.com/Neruba/marks/59283</link><description><![CDATA[<P>Before deciding on the USB vs Firewire factor, it is important to consider crucial factors like fireware drivers, speed etc. This webpage lists a host of valuable articles on this debate with special emphasis on real life scenario.&nbsp; You can read them if you are less oriented to this. If otherwise, you can still go through them for confirming that you have right info.</P>]]></description><category>USB vs Firewire: the web-game is on</category><author>Neruba</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:20:44 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:59283</guid></item><item><title>USB vs Firewire: the Mac yardstick</title><link>http://trailfire.com/Neruba/marks/59284</link><description><![CDATA[<P>With valuable info like “FireWire 400 is rated at 400 megaBITS per second (50 megaBYTES per second) -- 80 megaBITS slower rating than USB 2.0..”, this article focuses on the speed of USB vis-à-vis Mac. The factors and the comparison is well established with graphs and tabulations for clear understanding.</P>]]></description><category>USB vs Firewire: the web-game is on</category><author>Neruba</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:22:58 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:59284</guid></item><item><title>USB vs Firewire: the web-arguments</title><link>http://trailfire.com/Neruba/marks/59286</link><description><![CDATA[<P>There seems to be no ending to the argument over USB vs Firewire. While on the one hand some argue “USB is the answer to replacing the &quot;old&quot; ports such as PS/2, parallel and serial ports”, on the other some still uphold the advantages of firewire. This webpage provides an article that accommodates heated discussion on the USB vs Firewire topic.</P>]]></description><category>USB vs Firewire: the web-game is on</category><author>Neruba</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:24:09 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:59286</guid></item><item><title>USB vs Firewire: the positive and negatives balanced</title><link>http://trailfire.com/Neruba/marks/59287</link><description><![CDATA[<P>It is not very difficult to find strong supporters of either USB or Firewire; but often they fail to justify their choice with valid points. Here’s a source that compares USB vs Firewire on the basis of their architecture, hard drive performance. You can also find some questions on this along with answers for better understanding.</P>]]></description><category>USB vs Firewire: the web-game is on</category><author>Neruba</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:25:20 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:59287</guid></item><item><title>USB vs Firewire- the complete guide</title><link>http://trailfire.com/Neruba/marks/59289</link><description><![CDATA[<P>There is no point in arguing for USB or Firewire without knowing the features in-depth or about the capabilities of both, individually. This webpage houses a galore of brilliant and comprehensive articles on USB vs Firewire for comprehensive knowledge. You can go through them for better understanding of USB vs Firewire.</P>]]></description><category>USB vs Firewire: the web-game is on</category><author>Neruba</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:26:24 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:59289</guid></item></channel></rss>
