<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/pages/css/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss xmlns:ps="http://trailfire.com" version="2.0"><channel><title>"Development of Western Astronomical Thought" by linzel</title><link>http://trailfire.com/linzel/trails/55411</link><category>linzel/trails</category><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>History and Philosophy of Western Astronomy</title><link>http://trailfire.com/linzel/marks/192098</link><description><![CDATA[<SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">Two main things you need to represent in your presentation:</SPAN><BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">1.</SPAN> The process of science gathers evidence on the journey to understanding. Science does not attempt to declare what the truth is, science is the journey to understanding.<BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">2.</SPAN> Be sure to state and explain the Pythagorean paradigm. it has three parts listed near th end of the page. You need to be able to show how science gathered evidence to eventually show the three parts of the paradigm as inaccurate.]]></description><category>Development of Western Astronomical Thought</category><author>linzel</author><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:18:44 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:192098</guid></item><item><title>Plato, Aristarchus, Ptolemy</title><link>http://trailfire.com/linzel/marks/192101</link><description><![CDATA[<SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">You need to explain the following within your assignment:</SPAN><BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">1.</SPAN> State the meaning of a geocentric model..<BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">2.</SPAN> State [in your own words] the evidence early philosophers used to support the geocentric theory.<BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">3.</SPAN> Explain the problem of retrograde motion and why this posed a problem to the geocentric model.<BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">4.</SPAN> State and explain the Aristotelean model of the spheres as an improved model of the Pythagorean Paradigm.<BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">5.</SPAN> State and explain the improvements Ptolemy made on the geocentric model to account for retrograde motion. How did his model account foe the increase in planet brightness [luminosity]?<BR><BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">As an aside, Ptolemy also produced a map of grids - essentially latitude and longitude- that was ignored for 1500 years because it conflicted with the interpretation of the Bible at that time.</SPAN>]]></description><category>Development of Western Astronomical Thought</category><author>linzel</author><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:34:21 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:192101</guid></item><item><title>Copernicus, retrograde redux, Tycho Brahe</title><link>http://trailfire.com/linzel/marks/192109</link><description><![CDATA[<SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">I would like you to indicate how individuals were beginning to be able to challenge mainstream societal beliefs.</SPAN><BR>The development of the printing press allowed many more people to write and print their thoughts. Education slowly spread. Books were able to be written in many more languages - rather than just Latin. People could read the Bible in their own language. These led to the reformation and challenge to the Holy Catholic Church.<BR>It was the time of the Renaissance.&nbsp; The rebirth of European thought. this included a challenge to the geocentric model of the &#39;universe&#39;.<BR>Copernicus, although Christian, used modern theological interpretations to suggest a heliocentric model. The problem was the evidence did not justify the changes. The only reason to accept the change was the precept of &#39;Occam&#39;s razor&#39;. The fact was Copernican thought was a simpler explanation that the previous Ptolemaic model.<BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">Be sure to explain how the Copernican model easily resolves the retrograde motion problem by eliminating the complexities of epicycles.</SPAN> However, because the planets still moved on perfect circles, this prevented the Copernican model from being more accurate than Ptolemy&#39;s. It hindered people form adopting it.<BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">Ultimately - i want you to explain how the Ptolemaic model was generally accepted, the Copernican was simpler but no more accurate and how it set that stage for Tycho&#39;s observations to be used by Johann Kepler.</SPAN><BR STYLE="font-weight: bold;">]]></description><category>Development of Western Astronomical Thought</category><author>linzel</author><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:52:16 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:192109</guid></item><item><title>Galileo, new evidence and the heliocentric model</title><link>http://trailfire.com/linzel/marks/192118</link><description><![CDATA[The importance of this page deals with Galileo&#39;s use of the telescope to survey the solar system. Galileo did not invent the telescope, its invention is credited to Hans Lippershey - a Dutchman. Although the dutch attempted to keep it a military secret, Galileo soon was improving the device tenfold. He then pointed it upward.<BR>Galileo was also a Christian and struggled with his observations. However, his evidence challenged the generally accepted concept that the objects in space were perfect and all revolved around Earth.<BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">State the evidence Galileo gathered that convinced him of the Copernican model correctness.<BR>Also, Galileo was one of the first &#39;true&#39; scientists. He experimented. He understood that a theory or model must be consistent with the evidence. Explain how his new evidence convinced many to replace the Ptolemaic with the Copernican model.<BR><BR></SPAN>]]></description><category>Development of Western Astronomical Thought</category><author>linzel</author><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:07:00 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:192118</guid></item><item><title>Johann Kepler and the modern hypothesis</title><link>http://trailfire.com/linzel/marks/192120</link><description><![CDATA[Now it is time for you to find the evidence Johann Kepler used to substantiate the Copernican model. His modifications of the Copernican model allowed for a much greater accuracy in predicting celestial events - eclipses and such.<BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">State the modifications Johann made to the Pythagorean Paradigm, Ptolemaic model that finally substantiated the Copernican heliocentric model as a more accurate, simpler explanation of the universe.</SPAN><BR>His modifications directly refute all three of the original steps of the paradigm.<BR><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: bold;">Also, define - in your own words - the meaning of aphelion, perihelion, eccentricity, focus [foci] and the major and minor axis.</SPAN>]]></description><category>Development of Western Astronomical Thought</category><author>linzel</author><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:14:56 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermalink="false">trailfire:markId:192120</guid></item></channel></rss>
